Iffat Jahan
BRAC University
When Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi and Bangladesh’s Home Minister signed a memorandum of understanding in Dhaka on 8 May 2026, the headline was about drugs, but the subtext was about geopolitics.
On its face, an agreement on narcotics is ordinary administrative cooperation, the kind of routine accord governments sign every year. Between Pakistan and Bangladesh, however, it is something more. Their relationship has carried the weight of 1971 for over five decades, so even a technical pact becomes a signal.
The purpose of this analysis is to look past the stated aims and ask what the agreement reveals about each government’s ambitions, and about how India and the wider region are likely to read it.
What the Agreement Says
Pakistan’s interior ministry says the two governments will work together to stop the illegal transport and smuggling of narcotics and to counter the rising problem of drug abuse. To that end, they will draft a joint strategy for dismantling sale and supply networks, share timely intelligence on traffickers, and exchange training, modern technology and best practices, with a secretary-level joint working group overseeing the effort.
The visit, however, covered far more than narcotics. The ministers also discussed internal security, training for civil armed forces, counter-terrorism, human trafficking, cybercrime, organized crime and financial fraud, as well as places for trainees at police academies. Beyond these talks, Naqvi pledged full support for Bangladesh’s Safe City project and invited his counterpart to visit Pakistan.
The Current State of Ties
The agreement is the most recent milestone in a gradual warming of ties. Relations were uneasy under Sheikh Hasina, then improved sharply after her removal in 2024. Pakistan’s foreign minister held talks with Muhammad Yunus in Dhaka in August 2025, direct flights resumed after a fourteen-year gap, and Pakistani leaders attended both Khaleda Zia’s funeral and Prime Minister Tarique Rahman’s swearing-in. Regional media have further reported that Bangladeshi civil servants are being trained in Lahore, a sign that cooperation now reaches into the machinery of government as well as diplomacy.
Still, the pact has practical limits. Pakistan and Bangladesh do not share a border, so the narcotics trade that most directly affects Bangladesh flows across its land frontiers with India and Myanmar. An accord between Dhaka and Islamabad can strengthen intelligence sharing, training and efforts against money laundering networks, but it cannot substitute for working arrangements with Bangladesh’s immediate neighbors. Its significance is therefore as much political as operational: it signals closer alignment more than it transforms enforcement on the ground.
The Political Agenda
Pakistan’s motive is straightforward. Islamabad wants a larger regional role, and a Bangladesh no longer led by a government hostile to it offers an opening. Security and law enforcement cooperation is a natural starting point: few can object to it, and it creates institutional ties likely to survive changes of government.
Bangladesh’s calculations are more complex. The current government campaigns under the banner of Bangladesh First and has tried to broaden its partnerships across China, the United States, Pakistan and India, following years in which Delhi held unusual sway in Dhaka. Engaging Pakistan demonstrates that independence, and it also speaks to a domestic constituency, including Islamist parties, that scrutinizes any hint of deference to India.
Yet the prime minister has also criticized Pakistan over 1971, which reveals the balance he is attempting: closer ties are acceptable, but not at the expense of national memory. The evidence of this balancing is the dual signal itself, though how far each gesture reflects strategy rather than political convenience remains an open question.
Where India Stands
India follows these developments closely. Delhi regards Dhaka’s growing closeness to Islamabad as a strategic setback and is concerned about the security implications for its eastern flank, particularly as Jamaat-e-Islami gains influence. The relationship, however, is not one of simple hostility. Bangladesh’s foreign minister visited Delhi after the February election, and Dhaka has publicly assured India that its ties with Pakistan will neither threaten Indian security interests nor obstruct relations with Delhi. Such assurances suggest that Dhaka wants to widen its options without forcing a choice between neighbors.
Several irritants nonetheless persist. Sheikh Hasina remains in exile in India, and the Teesta water-sharing agreement is still unresolved. India’s border fencing and the killings along the frontier continue to fuel resentment in Bangladesh, and the prime minister’s first visit to India has reportedly been postponed. Together, these issues show that the strain in bilateral ties predates the Pakistan question and would persist even if that question were resolved.
The Prospect
The drug pact will probably endure and grow modestly, since both governments benefit and it threatens no third party directly. Its wider significance depends on India. If Delhi sees it as part of a broader security alignment, its suspicions will harden, and the already difficult border and water disputes will become harder to resolve. If Dhaka keeps the Pakistan agenda to practical matters such as policing, trade and people-to-people links, and pursues a comparable narcotics and border security agenda with India, the pact can be absorbed into a balanced foreign policy.
That balance is Dhaka’s real test. Bangladesh has more room to maneuver than under Hasina, but it cannot treat India as a rival while sharing its longest land border. The best response to narcotics is cooperation along every frontier, not friendly signatures in one capital. How the government manages this, more than any single memorandum’s text, will determine whether its new diplomacy delivers security or merely deepens regional suspicion.
Reference:
