Desk Report
Oniket Desk
Bangladesh Bank (BB) has extended the deadline for distressed borrowers to submit applications for special loan restructuring support to 30 June 2026, pushing back from the previous cut-off of December 2025. The extension covers both unclassified loans eligible for special restructuring facilities and classified loans, categorised as substandard, doubtful, and bad or loss, as of 31 March 2026.
Under the policy framework first introduced in September last year, eligible borrowers may access repayment tenors of up to 15 years, down payments as low as 1 to 2 percent, and grace periods of up to three years. Banks have been instructed to dispose of applications within three months of receipt, with approvals becoming effective only after encashment of the requisite down payment. The directive took immediate effect under Section 49(1)(d) of the Bank Company Act, 1991.
The Caveats That Demand Attention
While the extension offers genuine breathing room to borrowers under stress, several caveats temper its effectiveness and deserve candid assessment. First, the exclusion of borrowers who have already received policy support under earlier circulars or through the restructuring selection committee, while administratively logical, risks leaving a residual category of distressed borrowers who applied but failed to qualify under earlier criteria without recourse. The circular does not address this transitional gap.
Second, the down payment threshold of 1 to 2 percent, though designed to be accessible, raises questions about moral hazard. At such minimal entry costs, the policy could inadvertently incentivise strategic defaulters (borrowers who can service debt but choose to exploit restructuring terms) alongside genuinely distressed businesses. Without a rigorous vetting mechanism to distinguish the two, the scheme risks rewarding opportunistic behaviour at the expense of banking sector health.
Third, the three-month application processing window, while defined, depends entirely on the administrative capacity and integrity of individual banks. Given that a significant portion of Bangladesh’s banking sector is already under stress from non-performing loan accumulation, the institutional bandwidth to process applications diligently rather than perfunctorily cannot be taken for granted.
Fourth, the policy offers no structural remedy for the root causes of default. For borrowers who defaulted due to currency depreciation, supply chain disruptions, or energy cost shocks, a rescheduled repayment timeline alone does not resolve the underlying viability problems of their businesses.
Supplementary Reforms That Must Follow
To maximise the policy’s effectiveness and protect the banking system from compounding risk, Bangladesh Bank and the government must pursue a concurrent set of structural reforms.
A credible and independent loan classification and assessment regime must be enforced. The five-member restructuring selection committee must be empowered with full access to borrower financial records, third-party audit reports, and sector-specific viability assessments and not merely self-declared distress claims. Transparency in the committee’s decisions should be mandated through published outcomes.
The policy must also be accompanied by a mandatory business recovery framework. Borrowers accessing restructuring facilities should be required to submit time-bound turnaround plans, with periodic compliance reviews built into the approval conditions. Restructuring without a recovery pathway merely defers the problem.
Finally, Bangladesh Bank should use this policy cycle as an opportunity to accelerate the long-overdue reform of the banking sector’s governance architecture, including strengthening the fit-and-proper criteria for bank directors, enhancing loan approval audit trails, and introducing independent risk management oversight. Relief without governance reform will only reproduce the conditions that necessitated the relief in the first place.
Keep reading Bangladesh Bank’s EV Loan Policy: a review
